Politician stock tracker

Check politician-trade claims against public filings before they become content.

TinyOps tracks the source trail behind congressional stock-trade claims: official filing links, ticker clusters, filing-date lag, purchase-versus-sale labels, and review gaps. It is built for creators, analysts, and newsletter operators who need clean citations before repeating a viral claim.

Paid use case

The product is fast citation cleanup for market-content teams.

When a post says several politicians bought a ticker, the useful deliverable is not a hype chart. It is a clean source packet that tells the buyer what is supported, what is only a ticker mention, and which dates can be safely cited.

$499

Tracker setup

Source-first monitoring package for teams that want a repeatable public filing queue, JSON feed, and no-advice caveats.

$4,999

Pipeline build

A dedicated source-check workflow for newsletters, trackers, apps, and finance-content teams that need repeatable publishing output.

Boundary

No investment advice

The tracker verifies public filing support. It does not recommend trades or use business funds for speculation.

Viral claim intake

If the claim is "copy what politicians bought," verify the filing trail first.

The page is aimed at creators and analysts who see a fast-moving ticker story and need to know what is actually in the public disclosure record before they publish, pitch, or build a content angle around it.

Current ticker universe

High-row tickers become the next claim-check queue.

These are public filing-row counts from the current text-layer pass. They are discovery targets for source review, not expected-return rankings.

33 rows

MSFT

15 members; 16 purchase-like; 17 sale-like. Stock

26 rows

AAPL

16 members; 14 purchase-like; 12 sale-like. Apple Inc. - Common Stock

24 rows

NVDA

12 members; 8 purchase-like; 16 sale-like. NVIDIA Corporation - Common Stock

23 rows

AMZN

11 members; 12 purchase-like; 11 sale-like. Amazon.com, Inc. - Common Stock

21 rows

GOOGL

10 members; 9 purchase-like; 12 sale-like. Stock

20 rows

ABT

11 members; 5 purchase-like; 14 sale-like. Abbott Laboratories Common Stock

19 rows

IBM

9 members; 9 purchase-like; 9 sale-like. Corporation Common Stock

17 rows

HD

8 members; 10 purchase-like; 7 sale-like. Home Depot, Inc.

Broad lag screen

The automation now screens broader purchase-like clusters after public filing date.

The broad lag screen uses the House PTR ticker universe, enters on the first market close on or after the public filing date, and compares forward windows with SPY. It is a source-research queue, not a trade signal.

TickerMembersPurchase rowsEventsAvg 20d vs SPYAvg 60d vs SPY
MSFT151616-3.06% (n=13, partial=3)-3.14% (n=11, partial=5)
AAPL161414-0.43% (n=12, partial=2)1.55% (n=8, partial=6)
AMZN111212-0.66% (n=11, partial=1)6.55% (n=10, partial=2)
HD81010-3.37% (n=9, partial=1)-5.48% (n=7, partial=3)
AMD710106.00% (n=9, partial=1)71.02% (n=6, partial=4)
GOOGL1099-3.26% (n=6, partial=3)4.22% (n=5, partial=4)
IBM999-4.86% (n=9, partial=0)-9.86% (n=7, partial=2)
META9992.47% (n=7, partial=2)-9.65% (n=6, partial=3)

Open the full broad filing-lag screen

Coverage status

House is automated; Senate stays explicit until the route is reliable.

The offer is stronger when it tells buyers exactly what is automated, what is portal/manual review, and what should not be treated as a signal.

Probe

Senate eFD source route

Portal status: senate_efd_home_reachable_data_route_unavailable. Data endpoint probe: HTTP 503. Senate coverage stays labeled route-pending until this is reliable.

Paid

Manual citation packet

For claims that cross House and Senate sources, the paid deliverable is a manual citation packet with public links and caveats, not an automated trade alert.

Named claim screen

NOW and CSCO already have buyer-relevant proof gaps.

Some names have purchase-like rows. Others have only official ticker mentions that still need table review. That distinction is exactly what the paid report sells.

TickerMemberStatusEvidence docs
NOWByron Donaldsofficial_purchase_like_text_found20034134
NOWTony Wiedofficial_ticker_mention_found_side_needs_table_review8221360, 9116260, 9116308
NOWRo Khannaofficial_ticker_mention_found_side_needs_table_review8221322, 8221358, 9115726, 9115822, 9116142, 9116206, 9116267
NOWCharles Fleischmannofficial_ticker_mention_found_side_needs_table_review9115704
NOWJosh Gottheimerofficial_purchase_like_text_found20033756, 20033930, 20034305, 20034585
NOWMichael McCaulofficial_ticker_mention_found_side_needs_table_review9115728, 9116141

Demand signal

Price moves create attention, but the citation has to come first.

These anchors explain why creators care about the topic. They do not prove that the public filing data caused the move.

TickerClaim anchorLatest closeMove note
CSCO2026-04-132026-08-21 close 111.0435.34% from anchor; not causality.
NOW2026-05-212026-08-21 close 128.4828.88% from anchor; not causality.

Filing-lag research

The current sample is mixed, which is why the paid product stays source-first.

The lag check enters on the first market close on or after the public filing date and compares each watched ticker to SPY. This is a tiny current-source sample, not a copy-trading model.

TickerEventsAvg 20d vs SPYAvg 60d vs SPY
CSCO618.28% (n=5, partial=1)18.18% (n=5, partial=1)
NOW61.95% (n=5, partial=1)10.45% (n=5, partial=1)

Latest official rows

Recent rows keep the page useful after launch.

Every row keeps a public filing link so a buyer can inspect the source before paying for a deeper check.

Filing dateTickerMemberSideDoc
8/7/2026NOWRohit Khannareview9116267
8/7/2026NOWMichael Rullisale-like20035147
8/5/2026NOWJulie Johnsonpurchase-like20035035
8/5/2026NOWJulie Johnsonsale-like20035035
8/18/2026NOWTony Wiedreview9116308
8/14/2026CSCORichard Dean Dr McCormickpurchase-like20035204
7/9/2026CSCORichard Dean Dr McCormicksale-like20034954
7/6/2026NOWRohit Khannareview9116206
7/24/2026NOWTony Wiedreview9116260
6/9/2026NOWRohit Khannareview9116142

Source boundary

Official sources first, viral framing second.

Third-party trackers and social posts are useful leads, but this surface treats them as citation-needed until official House or Senate disclosure material supports the claim.

Need one claim checked

Send the ticker, names, and link. Get a clean source-backed report.