Article 50 operational checklist | Updated August 3, 2026
EU AI Act Transparency Checklist
Triage whether an AI interaction or content workflow needs a user notice, machine-readable marking, a visible label, or documented human review.
Operational planning aid only. Not legal advice, certification, a conformity assessment, or a substitute for qualified review.
Four first-pass checks
Classify the workflow before choosing the control.
Seven-field evidence record
Make each transparency decision reviewable.
Use one row per AI interaction or content workflow. Keep the decision close to the operating system, publishing process, or release record instead of relying on a policy statement alone.
Record these fields
One row per workflow or content class- System, feature, and business purpose
- Provider, deployer, and accountable owner
- People or audience exposed to the system or output
- Required notice, mark, label, or review control
- Placement, timing, language, and accessibility method
- Exception or out-of-scope rationale with source
- Verification record, approval date, and next review date
Role-specific controls
Turn the legal category into an operating task.
Interaction and output controls
Map where the product directly interacts with people and where it generates or manipulates content.
- Place the interaction notice at the first direct exchange
- Test machine-readable marks across export and delivery paths
- Document editing, machine-to-machine, or other scoped exceptions
Exposure and publication controls
Identify emotion recognition, biometric categorisation, deepfakes, and public-interest publishing workflows.
- Inform exposed people where required
- Use clear, perceivable labels rather than relying only on metadata
- Retain the published version and disclosure evidence
Human-review evidence
For public-interest text, record substantive review and editorial responsibility where that basis is used.
- Name the reviewer and relevant subject-matter role
- Record what was checked, changed, approved, or rejected
- Do not treat spelling or grammar checks as substantive review
Application date and limited grace period
Article 50 applies from August 2, 2026.
The Commission's current FAQ says providers and deployers must comply from that date. It also describes a limited grace period to December 2, 2026 for the machine-readable marking obligation for certain generative AI systems placed on the market before August 2, 2026.
Do not generalize that limited marking transition into a blanket grace period for every Article 50 duty.
Official references
Verify the current scope before adoptionEuropean Commission Article 50 questions and answers
Choose the next step
Start self-serve or get a bounded policy draft.
AI policy generator
Generate a first-pass acceptable-use policy with organization, tool, data, approval, and incident fields.
Open Free GeneratorEditable policy template pack
Get the policy template, approved-tools register, rollout checklist, customization guide, and start-here file.
Get the Template PackCustomized policy starter
TinyOps drafts the policy, register, approval workflow, incident rules, and rollout checklist for one small organization.
Buy Policy StarterCompare the $2,500 diagnostic and $5,000 governance sprint for a bounded readiness and operating-control engagement.