Byron Donalds
NOW appeared in official public PTR text and OCR output with a purchase-like row. Filing doc: 20034134.
Public filing source screen
NOW and CSCO politician-trading claims: what the public filings can and cannot say.
Social posts around congressional stock disclosures often mix ticker mentions, transaction dates, filing dates, and later price moves. This source screen shows the useful part: official public House PTR evidence, table-review gaps, and the no-advice boundary.
Price-anchor context
The move explains the attention; it does not prove the source claim.
The June 2, 2026 refresh shows CSCO at $127.32 on June 2 versus $82.35 on the April 13 social-claim anchor, a +54.61% move. NOW was $126.33 on June 2 versus $99.69 on the May 21 claim anchor, a +26.72% move. Those numbers are useful context for why people share the claim, not proof that the filings caused the move.
- CSCO anchor: April 13, 2026 close $82.35 to June 2, 2026 close $127.32
- NOW anchor: May 21, 2026 close $99.69 to June 2, 2026 close $126.33
- Price source: public Yahoo Finance adjusted-close chart API in the local report
- Boundary: citation context only, no performance promise or trading signal
Official sources
The run used House public disclosure material.
Source links are public government filing pages and PDFs. The screen is useful for citation cleanup, newsletter review, and social-claim verification. It is not investment advice and it does not use nonpublic information.
- House financial disclosure search
- House 2026 disclosure index ZIP
- PTR PDFs referenced below are official public House files.
NOW claim screen
The NOW claim cluster had mixed evidence quality.
The useful distinction: a purchase-like row is different from a ticker mention in a scanned table that still needs manual review.
Josh Gottheimer
NOW had official public PTR evidence across multiple docs, including purchase-like rows and sell rows. Latest doc in this run: 20034585.
Ticker mentions need table review
Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, and Michael McCaul had official NOW ticker mentions in public PTR material, but the side and amount rows still need table review before calling those rows buys. Docs: 8221360, 9115822, 9115704, and 9115728.
CSCO claim screen
CSCO had official 2026 PTR rows, but "loaded up" is too loose by itself.
The screen found purchase and sale rows in public filings. A source cleanup should name the member, side, transaction date, filing date, amount band, and doc ID instead of turning a ticker list into a trading conclusion.
Maria Elvira Salazar
CSCO purchase rows appeared in official public PTR text with amount bands from $1,001 to $50,000. Filing doc: 20033993.
Gilbert Cisneros
CSCO appeared with both purchase and sale hints in a public PTR. Filing doc: 20033983.
Post date is not trade date
A social post date, a filing date, and the reported transaction date are different dates. Mixing them can make a claim sound stronger than the public record supports.
Method
A clean claim separates three facts.
1. Ticker presence
Does the ticker appear in an official public filing for the named member?
2. Transaction side
Does the table show purchase, sale, partial sale, exchange, option, or an uncertain OCR row?
3. Date alignment
Which date is transaction date, which is filing date, and which is merely the social-post anchor?
Boundary
No investment advice. No trade alert.
The paid package verifies public filing support for a ticker/member claim. It does not tell anyone to buy, sell, hold, short, copy, or trade a security.
- No market orders or trade execution
- No guaranteed-return or hindsight-alpha claim
- No nonpublic information
- No customer trade execution or portfolio routing
- No personal identity exposure
Need this for another ticker claim